ajax loader

Is flavor fight winnable ?

Is Flavor Fight Winnable?

What should vapers do to help win the flavor fight in California? Or, can they do anything at all?

Find out in this RegWatch Web Extra. Hear directly from Alex Clark, the Exec. Dir. of CASAA.org and learn what he thinks is possible and why he is hopeful—only on RegWatch by RegulatorWatch.com.

RegulatorWatch.com – July 1, 2017.

WATCH FEATURE

 

Flavors Banned! – San Francisco Drops Hammer on Vaping


…and from Cassa.org

San Francisco Passes One-Size-Fits-All Flavor Ban, Condemns Smokers to Status Quo

The ink is barely dry on amendments accepted during San Francisco’s Public Safety and Neighborhoods Committee hearing and the full Board of Supervisors has passedthe ordinance that bans the sale of flavored vapor products, tobacco products, and menthol cigarettes. The new law takes effect in April 2018.

To say that San Francisco’s decision to ban flavored vapor products is disappointing would be an understatement and minimizes the real impact of this horrible miscalculation. Whereas at least some study has gone into prohibiting the sale of menthol cigarettes, there is no evidence to suggest that banning low-risk nicotine products will benefit anyone. In fact, it is reasonable to infer from emerging data that banning flavored vapor and smoke-free tobacco products will send some people back to smoking while discouraging others from quitting. At the very least, banning flavored vapor products will delay quit-attempts resulting in an unnecessary harm to San Francisco’s smoking population.

Rather than consider innovative new ways to address the disease and early death attributed to smoking, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors has, instead, opted to experiment on their constituents with an untested policy. We need to emphasize that banning low-risk, smoke-free products is NOT based on evidence. This was purely an emotional decision.

The pace at which this ordinance was driven through San Francisco’s legislative process also indicates that very little deliberation took place. Zero consideration was given to city vape shop owners, who likely have thousands of quit-smoking stories to their credit. Even less consideration was given to individual consumers who shared their testimonials with the Public Safety Committee.

San Francisco has done a shameful thing, but there is still time to fix it. In the months leading up to implementing the flavor ban, there is still an opportunity to pass an exemption for low-risk tobacco and nicotine products. Considering the rate at which studies about tobacco harm reduction are emerging, it is possible we will have more evidence to support an exemption. Unfortunately, while we wait for the Board of Supervisors to come to their senses, hundreds of San Francisco residents will continue to smoke past a point where switching to a low-risk alternative could have saved their lives.

You can find the contact information for the SF Board of Supervisors here.

____________________________________

 

Share:Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail
Liked it? Take a second to support The Vapor Ninja on Patreon!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Translate

Follow WordPress.com on WordPress.com

Follow Us

Facebooktwittergoogle_pluspinterestyoutubetumblrinstagramFacebooktwittergoogle_pluspinterestyoutubetumblrinstagram

Donate

Support The Vapor Ninja on Patreon!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Twitter Feed

Friday, July 5th, 2019 at 11:15pm
@eaze Vaping is indeed the future.
Smoke has carbon, and is responsible for most lung problems resulting from combustion.
I suggest investing in a GOOD herb vape, at least $100-200 vape.
The others simply combust the herbs.
So many ppl dislike vaping bcuz they tried a bad device.
Friday, July 5th, 2019 at 3:44pm
@Kelpalots @DJColonelCorn A meta-study (I think around 2012) estimated that at the time ~17,000 people/year (in the US) died from complications arising out of internal gastrointestinal bleeding events thought to have been caused by NSAIDs.
(Thanks to Lightning on Disqus for this)
Yes, @Kelpalots, they do
Tuesday, July 2nd, 2019 at 6:11am
@KnowNicotine Vaping, whether done by a teen human or adult, has been shown to be practically harmless. While crying "Save The Children" they banned e-cigs, but not tobacco, in San Francisco recently. Saving the teens from the awful vape. Yeah. They also claim adults do not like flavors. Sure.
Tuesday, July 2nd, 2019 at 6:07am
@KnowNicotine Not happy with this teaser.
It's about, and labelled as, the "teen vaping 'epidemic'".
I'd rather my teen vape than smoke and get disease.
This is not why I donated. This 'teen epidemic' is their excuse to ban vaping.
"Save The Children!" they cry. When it's really about taxes.
Sunday, June 30th, 2019 at 6:30pm
"and from online retail..." .. how, exactly, well the enforce THIS I wonder....
Sunday, June 30th, 2019 at 12:38am
@Kpascuch My old home town has a lot to learn.
First came the flavor ban, now an outright ban on all e-cigs.
I can't believe at this stage of the game we're going backwards.
After all the progress we've made.
My DOCTOR even, has finally decided she approves of VAPING as she can see results https://t.co/OUcWPEelfn
TheVaporNinja photo
Sunday, June 30th, 2019 at 12:32am
@Kpascuch Sad.
I was just in Oakland, California.
They couldn't sell me vape liquid.
Of course, the tobacco was readily available.
As an ex-smoker I find that insulting. https://t.co/UAvfpOmJYO
TheVaporNinja photo
Thursday, May 23rd, 2019 at 7:56am
@KnowNicotine @Biebert @ThirdLineFilms @JenniBiebertMKE @JimiJakeShaw uh.... all of California isn't like what you saw... next time, come up North and see the redwoods !
All the best, Aaron. <3

Printerest Feed

 

error: Content is protected !!