Freemax Fireluke 2 / Twister 80w kit

The Fireluke M on my Wismec Tinker 2 mod

Greetings !

Today, we are reviewing the Freemax Fireluke 2 tank and its accompanying mod.

As you can see in the image, I’m using the new TX3 coil from Freemax for the Fireluke M. I also have some TX4 coils as well.

See that red dot ? That’s to tell you where the top slides back from, push there to slide it open and fill port is there.

The coils:

So what’s with new coils for this tank ? Well, the TX3 is a three-coil atomizer, and the TX4 is a four-coil.

These coils are both mesh style, made from kanthal. Here’s some close-ups of the coil:


That’s the three-coil tx3 above, a very nice vape indeed.

Here’s the tx4 :



The image of the tx3 came out better, the tx4 looks similar in real life, just has four coils instead of three.

The difference between the tx3 and the tx4 coils are noticeable. With the extra 4th coil, you definitely get more vapor.

Which of course means bigger clouds, more nicotine per puff, etc. I mean, you’ve got four coils workin’ for ya.

Downside ? Uses more juice, of course. However these coils really deliver a nice vapor.

They’re made with “tea fiber cotton”, not entirely up on this tea fiber cotton, but it’s a nice vape, it works well.

Here’s the coils they offer for the Fireluke 2:


So how’s the tank itself ?

Well, it vapes very well, and the stainless steel mouthpiece (“Drip Tip” people call them, now) actually stays quite cool. It’s an 810 sized wide bore, works very well. I was pleasantly surprised.

The tank has no leaks after a week of use. The top slides nicely and seals well. However, I have one MAJOR gripe:

The fill port (hole) is built primarily for plastic needle-nose bottles only. I use a glass bottle and dropper for my liquid, and had one heck of a time filling this tank. Even a 30ml sized dropper will not fit into the fill port. Also, its small size and no other air escape causes the liquid to pour over, unable to leak into the tank.

I have no solution for this other than using plastic needle-nose bottles, or, squeezing extremely slowly from a dropper. I guess needle-nose is more the norm these days, but many of us want to use glass bottles with glass drippers. Sadly, we cannot fill this tank without making a mess (unless inserted slowly).

The tank hits great, no issues.

The mod.

They come in six different colors, matching the mod color they come with:

The mod works well, it’s a spinner type, like we used years ago. Goes from 5-80 watts. The 5 isn’t clearly marked, but you can basically count back from 10 with line markers.

In the stock images the numbers are very clear and easy to read, however, my mod has them simply engraved with no ink, so it’s a bit hard to tell where the wattage is at. Set it and forget would be my advice.

Here’s an image of the mod with the tank. As you already saw, I got the brown one.



The mod hits well, fast firing. It’s got a 21600 battery inside, rated at 2300 mAh. Not exchangeable.

Would’ve been nice if we could change the battery out in this unit. I’m generally not a fan of internal irreplaceable batteries. However, it works well, but will not last an avid vaper a whole day, as you probably figured out already.

Back to the tank.

The tank is machined very well, replacing the coils is smooth and pleasant. Nice squishy seal.

The coils screw into both the top and bottom of the tank. Be sure to firmly tighten the coil into the base, so that, when you open the tank, the coil isn’t screwed into the top part. Never over-tighten vape parts.

The color is done well. Metallic, nice finish.

The top slides open, you push where the red dot indicates, and it reveals the fill port.

Again, this tank can pretty much only be filled by a plastic needle-nose bottle, or, an extremely small dropper.

That’s my main con for this tank. Lots of pros. The coils are quite good.


  • 28mm base diameter
  • 5mL maximum capacity
  • Stainless steel and pyrex-reinforced glass construction
  • Slide-to-open top fill design
  • 90% tea fiber cotton & 10% organic cotton coil construction
  • 810 driptip

So would I recommend it ?

Sure, it’s a good tank. I recommend you try it, it’s quite nice.





Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Follow on

Follow Us



Support The Vapor Ninja on Patreon!

Recent Comments

Twitter Feed

Saturday, October 10th, 2020 at 5:02am
@ChaunceyGardner @Dstat_THR @asthma I have COPD from my many years of tobacco abuse. I was wheezing and using inhalers. After quitting tobacco via vape technology, a few months later I was inhaler-free, symptom-free, and my doctor says my lungs sounds perfect. I was also using oxygen occasionally. Saved by the vape
Saturday, September 26th, 2020 at 4:24pm
@GrimmGreen @KatTimpf The last beef I ate was in about 1988.
You can do it too.
It's unnecessary and harmful. :)
Saturday, September 26th, 2020 at 4:16pm
Goodbye and farewell to @MendocinoVapors , they had to close shop due to being deemed 'non-essential'.
Thursday, September 24th, 2020 at 9:44am
@ChaunceyGardner I think the period after 'cost' was a typo, they meant to say 'more cost effective'.
Saturday, September 19th, 2020 at 5:07pm
I can't believe it's been a YEAR since #India has banned vaping. #vapingsaveslives and India has a high prevalance of #tobacco use.
I hope the protests go well and make a difference.
Saturday, August 29th, 2020 at 3:01pm
@ChaunceyGardner @GregTHR They know what they're doing. It's called funding from the #MSA agreement. Began with banning all flavor sales in #Oakland ,CA and then #SanFrancisco banned all vape sales.
Saturday, August 29th, 2020 at 4:07am
Well @MendocinoVapors is leaving Fort Bragg, #California because it was deemed a non-essential business and forced to stop sales in April. Read more about such closures here.
Thursday, August 27th, 2020 at 12:30pm
Well the #California #vape flavor ban passed and is waiting for #Newsom to sign it. Did you contact your policymakers about this when you could have ?
Thursday, August 27th, 2020 at 11:36am
@mikepesko @holyvapes @BradRodu @JAHA_AHA @NIH OK but.... according to that URL, Glantz et al has made approximately $13 million for 2 years of work. My earlier graph shows how he has made about $6 million a year for the past 5 years, basically since he took up 'nicotine studies'.
I say it's inexcusable, this amount of $$$.
Wednesday, August 26th, 2020 at 2:14pm
@holyvapes @mikepesko @BradRodu @JAHA_AHA @NIH Here's what went for this ONE article, yes, it DOES appear these grants were given for this ONE study. TheVaporNinja photo
Wednesday, August 26th, 2020 at 2:10pm
@holyvapes @mikepesko @BradRodu @JAHA_AHA @NIH Yes, but look at how much $$$ Glantz has received since he took up his anti-vaping 'studies' and activities... should someone like Glantz be given this much $$$ ? TheVaporNinja photo


Printerest Feed