E-Cigarettes: The HHS Smoking Gun

FILE – In this April 16, 2019 file photo, a woman exhales while vaping from a Juul pen e-cigarette in Vancouver, Wash. Schools have been wrestling with how to balance discipline with treatment in their response to the soaring numbers of vaping students. Using e-cigarettes, often called vaping, has now overtaken smoking traditional cigarettes in popularity among students, says the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Last year, one in five U.S. high school students reported vaping the previous month, according to a CDC survey. (AP Photo/Craig Mitchelldyer)

E-Cigarettes: The HHS Smoking Gun

By Steve Pociask & Krisztina Pusok
December 19, 2019

 

For months, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has been telling us that young people are becoming hooked on flavored e-cigarettes. Now, we know that not only was HHS wrong, but they knew better and were outrightly dishonest to the American public.

After months of sitting on the information, the CDC finally released the National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS) results, and unsurprisingly, the responses confirmed that vaping flavors are not at the root of the youth smoking crisis in this country.

According to the published data, barely one in five youths cited flavors, such as mint, candy, fruit or chocolate, as the reason they picked up vaping products. In fact, they ranked flavors just as important to them than their ability to “do tricks” with their vaping pens, like blowing smoke rings or making shapes. The reasons cited by teens ahead of those two categories and leading the charge in youth usage of vaping products, at 55.3 percent, was simply that they were “curious about them.”

Until now, the FDA and the administration have been staunchly blaming flavored vaping products for the spike in youth use, claiming that flavors have made the products more attractive to teenagers. Even though these survey results prove the opposite to be true, this empirical evidence did not come out and did not remove culpability from flavored products.

The newly released data also begs the question of how long has HHS had access to these results. The flavor ban was first proposed by President Trump on September 11th, but before that, the FDA had publicly blamed flavors for the crisis multiple times.

These survey results prove that not only has the conversation been unjustly manipulated by the government, but the subsequently proposed flavor regulation has the power to kill thousands of American jobs, without sound reasoning to back up the decision. Banning flavors will undoubtedly and unfairly punish well-intentioned companies in the vaping space, force former smokers to return to old habits, and potentially catalyze a black market of illicit products.

Most importantly and less recognized, these regulations will without question cost American lives. Data shows that e-cigarettes are 95% safer than smoking tobacco products and, compared to prescribed alternatives, are almost twice as effective in getting smokers off traditional cigarettes – potentially saving millions of lives. We hope that HHS cares about these lives.

The FDA claims to pride itself on being a fact-driven organization that uses statistics and hard data to come to conclusions. If that is truly the case, then the current data, combined with former data showing that kids overwhelming rank menthol, a “non-flavor” as their favorite, reveals the hard-and-fast facts that they have been ignored and shielded from the public.

The government bureaucracy has kept the American public in the dark in favor of politics. Not only that, but it turned out to be terrible politics, considering a flavor ban has considerable power to hurt Trump’s reelection, with polls showing 11 percent of Trump’s supporters are less likely to vote for a candidate who backs a flavor ban.

The needless domino effect of consequences that would result from this blatantly anti-business regulation would be catastrophic for the country. Going forward, we can only hope the administration leans on facts. Rather than haphazardly picking winners and losers in this situation, it should not continue along the path toward a nationwide flavor ban.

If safety is a concern to the FDA, then Americans deserve better.

Steve Pociask and Krisztina Pusok are with the American Consumer Institute, a nonprofit educational and research organization. For more information, visit www.TheAmericanConsumer.Org or follow us on Twitter @ConsumerPal.

 

This article originally appeared here: https://www.realclearhealth.com/articles/2019/12/19/e-cigarettes_the_hhs_smoking_gun_110977.html , republished by The Vapor Ninja.

 

Share:FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Translate

Follow WordPress.com on WordPress.com

Follow Us

FacebooktwitterpinterestyoutubetumblrinstagramFacebooktwitterpinterestyoutubetumblrinstagram

Donate

Support The Vapor Ninja on Patreon!

Recent Comments

Twitter Feed

Saturday, October 10th, 2020 at 5:02am
@ChaunceyGardner @Dstat_THR @asthma I have COPD from my many years of tobacco abuse. I was wheezing and using inhalers. After quitting tobacco via vape technology, a few months later I was inhaler-free, symptom-free, and my doctor says my lungs sounds perfect. I was also using oxygen occasionally. Saved by the vape
Saturday, September 26th, 2020 at 4:24pm
@GrimmGreen @KatTimpf The last beef I ate was in about 1988.
You can do it too.
It's unnecessary and harmful. :)
Saturday, September 26th, 2020 at 4:16pm
Goodbye and farewell to @MendocinoVapors , they had to close shop due to being deemed 'non-essential'.
https://t.co/Koa3mL7D7z
Thursday, September 24th, 2020 at 9:44am
@ChaunceyGardner I think the period after 'cost' was a typo, they meant to say 'more cost effective'.
Saturday, September 19th, 2020 at 5:07pm
I can't believe it's been a YEAR since #India has banned vaping. #vapingsaveslives and India has a high prevalance of #tobacco use.
I hope the protests go well and make a difference. https://t.co/6jIxGIdgKk
Saturday, August 29th, 2020 at 3:01pm
@ChaunceyGardner @GregTHR They know what they're doing. It's called funding from the #MSA agreement. Began with banning all flavor sales in #Oakland ,CA and then #SanFrancisco banned all vape sales. https://t.co/S0rh4MghVD
Saturday, August 29th, 2020 at 4:07am
Well @MendocinoVapors is leaving Fort Bragg, #California because it was deemed a non-essential business and forced to stop sales in April. Read more about such closures here. https://t.co/Koa3mL7D7z
Thursday, August 27th, 2020 at 12:30pm
Well the #California #vape flavor ban passed and is waiting for #Newsom to sign it. Did you contact your policymakers about this when you could have ? https://t.co/ZuuyY7t2BP
Thursday, August 27th, 2020 at 11:36am
@mikepesko @holyvapes @BradRodu @JAHA_AHA @NIH OK but.... according to that URL, Glantz et al has made approximately $13 million for 2 years of work. My earlier graph shows how he has made about $6 million a year for the past 5 years, basically since he took up 'nicotine studies'.
I say it's inexcusable, this amount of $$$.
Wednesday, August 26th, 2020 at 2:14pm
@holyvapes @mikepesko @BradRodu @JAHA_AHA @NIH Here's what went for this ONE article, yes, it DOES appear these grants were given for this ONE study. https://t.co/p12xY6vkET TheVaporNinja photo
Wednesday, August 26th, 2020 at 2:10pm
@holyvapes @mikepesko @BradRodu @JAHA_AHA @NIH Yes, but look at how much $$$ Glantz has received since he took up his anti-vaping 'studies' and activities... should someone like Glantz be given this much $$$ ? https://t.co/aW8Z9lFjVZ TheVaporNinja photo

Archives

Printerest Feed